
Scan the WeChat code to contact us
Scan the WeChat code to contact us
Feel free to send us a massage and we will reply to you as soon as possible.
Creating the future with heart and soul
In heavy-haul and high-speed rail systems, improving casting precision isn’t just a numbers game; it’s a key factor directly impacting assembly efficiency and operating costs. When a railway casting meets the RT6 standard (EN 1371-2), internal defects are strictly controlled to within 0.5 mm, equivalent to the thickness of five sheets of ordinary printing paper stacked together. This precision significantly reduces subsequent machining costs while increasing component service life. How can traditional sand casting overcome its limitations to meet the stringent requirements of modern rail transit? This article will provide an in-depth analysis from three perspectives: materials, processes, and process control.
Many foundries make a common mistake in sand formulation: increasing the bentonite content to increase sand mold strength. While this practice may improve moldability in the short term, it can lead to a sharp decrease in sand permeability in the long term. When the bentonite content exceeds 10%, gases generated during the pouring process cannot be effectively expelled, ultimately forming dense pores within the casting. Practice has shown that precisely controlling the bentonite content within the 6%-7% range, combined with real-time monitoring using an infrared moisture meter, can stabilize the molding sand’s moisture content within the ideal range of 3.2% ± 0.2%. Data from a specific test indicates that when the moisture fluctuation is less than 0.5%, the dimensional stability of the casting can be improved by over 40%.
In foundries using manual molding, the molding sand compaction rate often only reaches 65%-75%. This level of compaction makes it difficult to ensure geometric stability of the mold cavity under the impact of high-temperature molten steel. By introducing a combined process of pneumatic microvibration and hydraulic compaction, the compaction rate can be consistently increased to the optimal range of 78%-82%. This seemingly small improvement is equivalent to raising the concrete grade of a building foundation from C30 to C50, fundamentally improving the quality of the casting. Routine testing using a sand mold hardness tester maintains a Shore A hardness between 85 and 90, a key indicator for ensuring dimensional accuracy.
Standard sand casting still can’t be beat on price. But when a part has tricky shapes or can’t tolerate much size variation, that’s where lost foam casting pulls ahead. It’s all about accuracy: this method reliably hits ±0.3mm, blowing past the ±1.2mm typical for basic sand casting. This makes it the go-to method for lightweight components, particularly those with walls thinner than 5mm. It should be noted, however, that tooling development costs for lost foam casting run approximately 40% higher than traditional approaches, making this technology more appropriate for small-batch, high-value customized production orders.
The initial investment for resin-coated sand molds is three times that of traditional wooden molds, but their service life can reach over 3,000 cycles, far exceeding most commercially available mold materials. From a long-term perspective, when the cost of a single mold is spread over the entire production cycle, the actual cost is reduced to one-sixth of that of traditional processes. This kind of toughness does more than save money on each piece—it makes sure every batch of parts keeps its exact shape, run after run. That kind of reliability is everything for track components, where even a tiny misfit can cause big problems when putting them together.
Controlling molten steel temperature cannot be guaranteed by a single instrument; a multi-layered monitoring network is required. First, an infrared thermometer is used to scan the entire ladle to ensure that the melt temperature remains within the appropriate range of 1540±20°C. During the actual pouring process, a fast-acting thermocouple is used to perform spot measurements on the first tank of molten steel, strictly controlling the error within 5°C. Interestingly, many experienced craftsmen still use the traditional “egg yolk rule” for cross-verification: when the molten steel appears bright yellow, the temperature is generally between 1540-1560°C. This rule of thumb often closely matches the data from modern instruments.
Determining the optimal unpacking time demands careful timing. If castings are removed from their molds too soon—in under four hours—their surfaces remain too soft. This lack of hardening often leads to warping or distortion in later handling or machining stages. Unpacking too late (over 6 hours) reduces the collapsibility of the sand mold, increasing the cost of the sand cleaning process by over 30%. An empirical formula developed through long-term practice indicates that the optimal unpacking time (in hours) should be equal to the maximum wall thickness (in mm) of the casting multiplied by 0.1 plus 2. For example, for a typical rail component with a wall thickness of 60 mm, the ideal unpacking waiting time is approximately 8 hours.
The surface quality of RT6-grade precision castings is high enough for direct assembly, requiring only fine milling of critical mating surfaces. Test data shows that compared to conventional castings requiring full surface machining, these high-precision castings can save approximately 18% in machining costs, translating to a direct cost savings of approximately $120 per ton of casting. More importantly, by reducing the machining allowance from the conventional 5 mm to 2 mm, the amount of metal removed is significantly reduced, leading to a simultaneous decrease in tool wear by over 25%.
A case study from a bogie manufacturer is highly compelling. After switching to RT6-grade castings, a single bogie’s assembly time dropped from 8 hours to just 6.5—cutting nearly a fifth off the original time. Even more striking, bolt holes now align correctly 98 times out of 100, up from just 75, drastically slashing rework and fine-tuning during assembly. These efficiency gains often deliver two to three times more value than the pure material savings.
Achieving RT6-level precision doesn’t rely on a single technological breakthrough, but rather requires systematic standard deviation control across 37 key process nodes. When customers question the price difference, the most effective response isn’t to offer a price reduction, but to help them analyze the full lifecycle cost: a $120 savings in processing fees per ton of casting, along with the resulting improved assembly efficiency, ultimately translates into significant overall benefits.
Luoyang Fonyo Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, founded in 1998,is a manufacturer in cast railway parts. Our factory covers an area of 72,600㎡, with more than 300 employees, 32 technicians, including 5 senior engineers, 11 assistant engineers, and 16 technicians. Our production capacity is 30,000 tons per year. Currently, we mainly produce casting, machining, and assembly for locomotive, railcar, high-speed trains, mining equipment, wind power, etc. Our products have been exported to Russia, the United States, Germany, Argentina, Japan, France, South Africa, Italy and other countries.
Contact: Stella Liu
Email: sales@railwaypart.com
WhatsApp: +86-152-3615-7103